Skip to content
OVistoaIntelligence index
AboutMethodologyPricingDocs
Sign inSign up
BREAKINGPerson found dead in car after it plows into health club in Portland, Oregon38 min ago
Top StoriesUnited StatesCanadaWorldPoliticsGeneralBusinessTechHealthAviationSportsArtificial IntelligencePublishers

Scientific American

May 1, 2026

NASA’s X-59 in the air.
Scientific Americanby Jackie Flynn Mogensen·May 1, 2026

Watch NASA test its new X-59 jet designed to go faster than the speed of sound

Political lean
OVistoa

Article-level news analysis, transparent scoring, and API tools for readers, publishers, and teams that need source context.

DMCA and copyright review

Copyright owners can submit notices, counter-notices, and source material concerns through the dedicated review flow.

Open DMCA review

Product

  • Home
  • Feed
  • Search
  • Topics
  • Saved

Platform

  • About
  • Methodology
  • Home
  • Search
  • Saved
  • Me
center
Source quality40/100
Factual ratio85/100
Framing20/100

This next-generation plane is made to go faster than sound without producing a full sonic boomBy Jackie Flynn Mogensen edited by Claire CameronJoin Our Community of Science Lovers!NASA wants to make supersonic travel quieter. On Thursday the agency released new footage of its X-59 jet, a still-in-development plane that is designed to break the sound barrier over land—but with a sonic “thud” rather than a boom.Faster air travel speeds mean shorter flights. But when an aircraft travels more rapidly than the speed of sound, it creates shock waves, generating a sonic boom. Those sonic booms can be a nuisance for people living nearby and can even cause damage to homes and startle animals.The X-59 jet is NASA’s answer to that problem. Featuring a needlelike tip, it’s designed to travel at more than 1,000 miles per hour—about twice as fast as a commercial jet—while limiting the noise of the boom. NASA expects its sonic “thump” to be as loud as “distant thunder” or the thud of a car door closing down the block.On supporting science journalismIf you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories

Read at Scientific AmericanCompare full coverage

Lean: 0.000 · Source quality 40/100 · Factual vs opinion 85/100.

Score signature

Political lean

Political leancenterSource quality40/100Factual ratio85/100Framing20/100

Methodology

v1
100
Source diversity
across 1 outlet
Compare full coverage
  • Pricing
  • API docs
  • Publishers
  • Account

    • Sign in
    • Create account
    • Reader settings
    • API console

    Legal

    • Terms
    • Privacy
    • Security
    • DMCA

    © 2026 Vistoa. All rights reserved.

    Limited excerpts, attribution, analysis, and outbound publisher links remain core product boundaries.