

The Supreme Court on Wednesday ruled in First Choice Women’s Resource Centers v. Davenport that a group of faith-based pregnancy centers can litigate their challenge to New Jersey’s demands for information about the group’s fundraising practices in federal court. In a unanimous decision by Justice Neil Gorsuch, the justices rejected the lower courts’ conclusion that the group, First Choice Women’s Resource Centers, had not shown it had suffered the kind of injury from the subpoena that would give it a legal right to sue, known as standing. Although New Jersey says that it is investigating whether First Choice may have misled women about whether it provides certain reproductive-health services, such as abortions, the court’s ruling focused instead on the more technical – but not insignificant – question of when organizations and advocacy groups can bring lawsuits in federal court. First Choice describes itself as a “faith-based nonprofit” that provides “material support and medical services like ultrasounds and pregnancy tests under the direction of a licensed medical director.” In 2023, Matthew Platkin – who was then New Jersey’s attorney general – issued subpoenas to the group, seeking, among other things, information about its donors. First Choice challenged the subpoena in federal
Lean: 0.000 · Source quality 90/100 · Factual vs opinion 90/100.
© 2026 Vistoa. All rights reserved.
Limited excerpts, attribution, analysis, and outbound publisher links remain core product boundaries.