Skip to content
OVistoaIntelligence index
AboutMethodologyPricingDocs
Sign inSign up
BREAKINGPerson found dead in car after it plows into health club in Portland, Oregon39 min ago
Top StoriesUnited StatesCanadaWorldPoliticsGeneralBusinessTechHealthAviationSportsArtificial IntelligencePublishers

Scientific American

Apr 14, 2026

A conceptual illustration of a heart in flames.
Scientific Americanby Melinda Wenner Moyer·Apr 14, 2026

New evidence links heart disease to inflammation—and drugs can stop it

Political lean
OVistoa

Article-level news analysis, transparent scoring, and API tools for readers, publishers, and teams that need source context.

DMCA and copyright review

Copyright owners can submit notices, counter-notices, and source material concerns through the dedicated review flow.

Open DMCA review

Product

  • Home
  • Feed
  • Search
  • Topics
  • Saved

Platform

  • About
  • Methodology
  • Home
  • Search
  • Saved
  • Me
n/a
Source qualityn/a
Factual ration/a
Framingn/a

Doctors have been drilled for decades on the four big risks for heart disease, which kills more Americans every year than any other illness. The fearsome foursome: hypertension, smoking, high levels of “bad” LDL cholesterol and type 2 diabetes. Yet for just as long cardiologists have seen patients who have none of these problems die from heart ailments. And the heart specialists haven’t had the slightest idea why.Up to a quarter of the people admitted to hospitals for heart attacks don’t have any of these four risk factors. Mysteriously, these “low-risk” heart disease patients actually have the worst outcomes. A 2023 analysis found that hospitalized acute coronary patients without any of the four hazards were 57 percent more likely to die compared with those who had at least one.If the big known risk factors miss one in four patients, they still predict trouble as expected for the remaining three. That’s a good record. But it also means that of the roughly 920,000 Americans who die of cardiovascular disease every year, about 230,000 of them will have done so for no understandable reason.On supporting science journalismIf you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription

Read at Scientific AmericanCompare full coverage

Lean: n/a · Source quality n/a · Factual vs opinion n/a.

Score signature

Political lean

Political leann/aSource qualityn/aFactual ration/aFramingn/a
100
Source diversity
across 1 outlet
Compare full coverage
  • Pricing
  • API docs
  • Publishers
  • Account

    • Sign in
    • Create account
    • Reader settings
    • API console

    Legal

    • Terms
    • Privacy
    • Security
    • DMCA

    © 2026 Vistoa. All rights reserved.

    Limited excerpts, attribution, analysis, and outbound publisher links remain core product boundaries.